red print means that it was added or changed from the original

red marks:
(p. 3) Abbott shook his head. <red>"</red>We don't know."
(p. 4) When he was pressed to tell hi<red>s</red> name   - "his" was "him"
(p. 12) "If you will tell me your name, I'll try to <red>find</red> her." - 'fine' in original
(p. 19) he <red>t</red>old George loftily. - "g" in original
(p. 19) George watched with sympathy a<red>s</red> - "d" in original
(p. 31) aint it<red>?</red> Might  - Original had an end quote after question mark.
(p. 32) "In ou<red>r</red> little settlement - "t" in original
(p. 33) Miss Anne to help you <red>strain it<red>."  - one word (strainit) in original
(p. 36) An<red>d</red> everthing was so strange to him - "y" in original
(p. 39) and followed well-traveled trails - This was the end of line in original. Not sure if hyphen is part of word.	
(p. 41) Cynthia, Katherine<red>,</red> and Anne helped - comma missing in original
(p. 42) "Me? But I----,<red>"</red> she glanced - end quote not in original
(p. 52) on Sunday <red>en</red> they won't - could not read
(p. 68) could always hire a slave from Dr<red>.</red> Morrison whose house - missing period in original
(p. 70) snapped and she began to sob <red>a</red>loud. - "sloud" in original
(p. 71) An answering <red>smile</red> touched - "smiled" in original
(p. 81) The silence grew, <red>was</red> pregnant with meaning. - should I remove "was"?
(p. 82) became Mr. and <red>Mrs.</red> George W. Cato. - "Mr." in original
(p. 82) wept when he heard Jane's <red>cries</red>.  - cried in original
(p. 83) so you'll be <red>strong</red> for her - "strength" in original
(p. 89) George went with him to the <red>front</red> door where, - "fron" in original
(p. 89) to brush away some <red>imaginary</red> object  - "imaginery"
(p. 96) peaks proudly flung <red>against<red> the flawless blue - "aginst" in original
(p. 100) a friendly argument, <red>than</red> which he liked - doesn't sound right. Left it same
(p. 102) warm enough to <red>accommodate<red> the ever-increasing - "acomodate" in original
(p. 106) But <red>now</red>. Now he was neglected, discarded, forgotten. - "now now" in original
(p. 116) and they'll be glad to <red>recommend</red> you to other people. - 'reccomend' in original
(p. 119) A <red>?eat</read> light began to dawn - beginning of word unreadable
(p. 118) "Looks like Frederick or <red>Billy could</red> do something. - 'Billy one could' in original
(p. 133) Robert spent two days in thinking bitterly <red>about</red> - 'about' was handwritten onto the original copy
(p. 136) don't you see, we're all <red>in</red> this together - 'in' was 'if' in original
(p. 142) "You've been perfect. I wouldn't <red>wish</red> you any different except - 'wish' not in original
(p. 162) appeared to be a particularly <red>vicious</red> form of cold. - 'viscious' in original
(p. 169) and touched the knitted red <red>wool</red> shawl which had been Jane's - 'wood' in original
(p. 173) she timidly asked one night <red>if</red> she shouldn't write - 'is' in original
(p. 175) <red>Out</red> of her widsom she answered, - 'Our' in original
(p. 186) Making the <red>molasses</red> for winter use - 'moalsses' in original


other notes.
(p. 3) Is spectulatively a word? Is it a mistake in the writing? - left it same in doc.
(p. 10) spelled "Intendent" in orginal. Left it same in doc.
(p. 171) And I'm a gittin' mighty tird. Ever - should that be 'tired'? Or is this showing the way she said it?